Comparing Period-End Closing of Product Cost Collectors and Manufacturing Orders

Objective

After completing this lesson, you will be able to compare period-end closing for the product cost collector and the manufacturing order

Comparison Between Period-End Closing for Product Cost Collector and Manufacturing Order

A table comparing full and periodic settlement for controlling objects, work in process, variances and settlement, highlighting differences in production orders, cost collectors, and timing.

Production Orders

Every production order can use one of the following costing methods:

  • Product Cost by Order
  • Product Cost by Period

You select the costing method in Customizing in Cost-Accounting-Relevant Default Values for Order Types and Plants.

Available Options

The following options are possible for selecting the costing method:

  • If you use Product Cost by Period with a product cost collector, the product cost collector order type will use the default rule STR. The manufacturing order type uses the default rule PP2 (periodic settlement). The Product Cost Collector indicator is set there as well.
  • If you use Product Cost by Period without the product cost collector, the order type of the manufacturing order will use the default rule PP2 (periodic). The Product Cost Collector indicator is not selected. Although this controlling method is possible, it is not recommended by SAP.
  • If you use the Product Cost by Order, the order type of the manufacturing order will use the default rule PP1 (full settlement). The Product Cost Collector indicator is not selected.

If you automatically post the determined WIP to Financial Accounting (FI) with the settlement, the WIP settlement must be carried out in every period.

Final Costing in Product Cost by Period

A diagram showing actual costs, valuated goods receipt, WIP at target cost, and variance over three time periods, with the variance decreasing each period.

When you use periodic settlement, WIP and variances are shown for each period at the same time.

Status-Based Final Costing in Product Cost by Order with Full Settlement

Diagram shows formulas for calculating Work in Progress at Actual Cost, Valued Goods Receipt, and Variance based on Actual Costs during order status from Preliminary Release, Partially Delivered to Delivery Completed.

If you use full settlement, the system calculates WIP and the variances based on the status of the order.

Effect on the Calculation of WIP

The following table shows the effect on the calculation of WIP and variances based on the status of the order:

Status of the OrderAction
Released, Partially released, or Partial deliveryThe system calculates WIP.
Delivered or Technically CompleteThe system cancels the remaining WIP balance from the previous period and calculates variances.

A  WIP balance and variance calculation cannot occur at the same time in the same period.

Advantages of Cost Object Controlling Using Product Cost Collectors

  • Supports lean cost management.
  • Focuses more on the product or production as a process and less on the logical type of production.
  • The reduced number of cost objects improves the period-end closing process.
  • Variances are recognized in the period in which they occur.

Disadvantages of Cost Object Controlling Using Product Cost Collectors

  • It is not obvious whether the costs are assigned to the production order according to cause.
  • This controlling method is not recommended if production involves significant set-up costs, if lot sizes vary significantly, or if the Bill of Material (BOM) and routing are not stable.
  • It is not available if WIP and variance analysis is required at co-product level or when using collective orders.

Summary

  • Product cost by order uses full settlement with default rule PP2.
  • Product cost by period uses periodic settlement with default rule STR.
  • Periodic settlement shows work in process and variances for each period simultaneously.
  • Full settlement calculates work in process and variances based on order status.