Explaining Mandatory Global and Regional Non-pricing Carbon Legislations

Objective

After completing this lesson, you will be able to describe the relevant global and regional non-pricing carbon legislations to your customers.

Introduction | Types of Carbon Legislation

Worldwide, companies face two broad categories of carbon legislation: non-pricing and carbon pricing instruments.

Non-pricing legislationCarbon pricing instruments
include mandatory Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and climate-related financial disclosure requirements.include Emissions Trading Systems (ETS, cap-and-trade), carbon taxes and trade measures like Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAM).

Note

There are several non-pricing and carbon-pricing measures, but this learning journey will cover only some representative regulations. In this lesson, you will learn about non-pricing reporting and disclosure legislation; in the next lesson you will move on to carbon pricing instruments, the cap and trade system EU ETS as well as the trade measure CBAM.

Different jurisdictions apply different regulatory measures. Some regions use several measures, while others use only one or two. Even if your home market has just one type of regulation, cross-border business will expose you to others – so understanding the ones a company is impacted by is essential for operating internationally.

Non-pricing Reporting and Disclosure Legislation

Let us first consider non-pricing legislation. The primary purpose of disclosure requirements is to enhance corporate accountability and transparency regarding environmental impacts. By mandating companies to measure and disclose their greenhouse gas emissions, regulators create greater visibility into corporate climate performance. This transparency enables stakeholders – including investors, customers, policymakers, and the public – to assess a company’s environmental footprint and make more informed decisions.

Beyond transparency, standardized disclosure requirements improve the comparability and reliability of climate-related data. This allows financial markets to better integrate climate risks and opportunities into investment decisions and encourages companies to systematically measure, manage, and ultimately reduce their emissions.

Five-step climate disclosure process under regulation.

Importantly, disclosure regulations do not exist in isolation. They form part of a broader policy framework through which governments pursue national and international climate targets. Many jurisdictions have set ambitious sustainability goals – for example, the European Union’s climate neutrality objective under the EU Green Deal. Reporting frameworks such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) serve as key policy instruments to support these ambitions. By requiring companies to report standardized sustainability and emissions data, regulators create the informational foundation needed to track progress toward climate goals, guide capital allocation toward more sustainable activities, and strengthen corporate accountability.

Ultimately, disclosure-based regulation complements other climate policy tools, such as carbon pricing or sector-specific standards. Together, these instruments encourage businesses to integrate carbon management into their strategic decision-making and contribute to the broader transition toward a low-carbon economy.

Now, you will learn about various non-pricing reporting and disclosure legislation.

EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is a European Union regulation that requires companies to disclose their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance with a level of rigor comparable to financial reporting. Within the ESG framework, the CSRD places particular emphasis on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reporting, which forms a central component of climate-related disclosures.

The reporting requirements under the CSRD are defined by the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). These mandatory standards specify how companies must report sustainability information, including the structure, metrics, and qualitative disclosures that must be provided.

A core principle of the CSRD is the Double Materiality Assessment (DMA). Companies must assess both:

  • how sustainability matters may create financial risks or opportunities for the business (outside-in perspective, also referred to as financial materiality) and
  • how the company’s activities impact the environment and society (inside-out perspective, referred to as impact materiality). If climate change is identified as a material topic under either perspective, companies are required to disclose relevant climate-related information in accordance with the ESRS.
Double Materiality showing two overlapping circles. The left circle labeled Outside In, right circle labeled Inside Out and the overlapping center section is labeled ESRS Aligned Disclosure.

Under the CSRD, companies must report their total greenhouse gas emissions across Scope 1, Scope 2, and – where material – Scope 3, expressed in CO₂ equivalents. Emission removals, as well as the use of carbon credits or offsetting mechanisms, must be disclosed separately to ensure transparency and comparability.

These disclosures rely on standardized and quantitative metrics, which require companies to apply carbon accounting methodologies to measure, consolidate, and report emissions across their operations and value chains. Robust carbon accounting systems are therefore a fundamental prerequisite for CSRD-compliant climate reporting.

In addition, companies must disclose further information on topics such as material climate-related risks and opportunities, transition plans, and the governance and management of climate-related issues.

In practice, this means that many companies must establish new data collection processes, internal controls, and governance structures to ensure the accuracy and auditability of emissions data.

Companies in Scope

The directive applies to EU-based companies and to non-EU companies with significant business activities within the EU. This makes CSRD not just a European initiative but one that has global implications for companies trading in Europe.

The scope of CSRD is updated per the Omnibus I. Under Omnibus I, the scope is significantly narrowed to focus on the largest undertakings and to reduce indirect reporting pressure along value chains.

Note

You will learn in detail about the Omnibus simplification package later.

EU based companies in scope:

  • Companies with more than 1,000 employees, and
  • Either a net turnover exceeding €50 million, or
  • A balance sheet total exceeding €25 million

Prerequisite: Meeting at least two of the above three criteria, in line with the revised "large undertaking" definition under Omnibus I.

Non-EU based companies:

  • EU net turnover exceeding €450 million at consolidated level, and
  • Either at least one large EU subsidiary meeting in scope EU criteria and applicable financial thresholds (see above), or
  • An EU branch with net turnover exceeding €50 million within the EU
An overview of CSRD and its thresholds.

Here is a table indicating how the CSRD scope differs before and after the Omnibus.

Category

Before Omnibus

After Omnibus

EU-based companies

In scope if both: > 1,000–1,750 employees and > €50–€450m net turnover (balance-sheet threshold not specified).In scope if at least two of the following: > 1,000 employees; net turnover > €50m; balance sheet total > €25m.

Non-EU based companies

In scope if EU net turnover > €150m AND either: a qualifying EU subsidiary with turnover > €40m, OR an EU branch with turnover > €40mIn scope if EU net turnover > €450m (consolidated) AND either: at least one large EU subsidiary meeting the above EU thresholds, OR an EU branch with EU net turnover > €50m.

CSRD implementation follows a phased approach over several years, reflecting both the complexity of sustainability reporting and the gradual expansion of the directive’s scope. Prior to the introduction of the CSRD, ESG reporting in the EU was primarily governed by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) and various national regulations, which resulted in limited harmonisation across Member States.

Over time, the scope of the CSRD will expand to include large unlisted companies that meet the same size thresholds, as well as certain non-EU companies with significant business activities within the EU. Although small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are not immediately required to comply, they are encouraged to begin preparing. To support this, the EU is developing simplified voluntary reporting standards that SMEs can use to align their sustainability disclosures with the expectations of larger customers, business partners, and other stakeholders.

Reporting Timelines and Phases

To reflect this gradual expansion of scope, the CSRD establishes a staged implementation timeline under which different groups of companies become subject to the reporting requirements over several years.

ESG reporting phases timeline from 2023 to 2028.
  • 2024: From financial year 2024 (reports published in 2025), large EU-listed companies and public-interest entities previously subject to the NFRD began reporting under the CSRD framework.
  • 2027: From financial year 2027 (reports published in 2028), large unlisted EU companies are expected to report under the CSRD, subject to the revised scope thresholds introduced by the Omnibus I simplification package.
  • 2028: From financial year 2028 (reports published in 2029), non-EU companies with significant operations in the EU are expected to become subject to CSRD reporting obligations, provided they meet the revised EU turnover and establishment criteria under Omnibus I.

Note

The above timelines reflect the post-Omnibus I political agreement and may still be subject to adjustment following publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and national transposition. Implementation details, including transitional reliefs and scope limitations, may evolve through delegated acts and guidance.

While disclosure frameworks play a crucial role in supporting climate policy objectives and improving corporate transparency, sustainability regulation is not static. As governments refine their climate strategies and respond to economic and administrative considerations, regulatory frameworks continue to evolve. The European Union provides a clear example of this dynamic regulatory environment, as illustrated by the recent "Omnibus" simplification initiative.

The Omnibus Simplification Package

In 2025, the European Commission proposed the "Omnibus" Simplification Package, aiming to postpone certain implementation timelines and reduce the sustainability reporting and due diligence burden for specific groups of companies. This development illustrates the dynamic and evolving nature of EU sustainability regulation and highlights the importance for companies to closely monitor regulatory developments and maintain flexible reporting systems that can adapt to changing legal requirements.

Key impacts of EU Omnibus: delays, simplification, and report harmonization.

In February 2026, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union reached a final agreement on the EU’s "Omnibus I" simplification package. The package introduces significant amendments to key sustainability legislation, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting

Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The initiative forms part of the European Commission’s broader competitiveness and growth agenda and aims to streamline reporting requirements, significantly reduce the number of mandatory datapoints, and narrow the scope of companies subject to sustainability obligations.

While the core principles of EU sustainability regulation – such as double materiality, climate transparency, and risk-based reporting – remain unchanged, the reforms are expected to substantially reduce both the number of companies within scope and the overall administrative burden. The Omnibus I package has been politically adopted and will enter into force following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Member States will then have a defined transposition period to implement the amendments into national law.

Omnibus exemplifies the volatile nature of sustainability regulations and the resulting need for companies to keep abreast of developments and invest into solutions that enable agile adjustment of reporting in line with changing regulatory requirements.

Other Major Non-pricing Legislation

Further major non-pricing legislations are outlined in the following.

International Financial Reporting Standards IFRS S1 & S2 — The Global Baseline Outside Europe

For companies operating outside the EU, IFRS S1 and S2 are the key standards to know. They were developed by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), part of the IFRS Foundation.

IFRS S1covers sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could affect a company's enterprise value

IFRS S2covers climate-specific disclosures: GHG emissions, transition planning, and climate scenario resilience

Both standards are build on the TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures) recommendations and align with the GHG Protocol. The goal is to integrate sustainability reporting into the same governance and financial systems companies already use — making disclosures consistent and comparable for investors across markets.

Important distinction: IFRS S1/S2 are not regulations. They are a global reporting standard that individual countries choose to adopt and implement through their own legislation. Timelines and scope hence vary by country.

As of early 2026, 18 countries had fully adopted ISSB standards, with 15 more in progress. Examples include the following:

  • Hong Kong — mandatory from Q3 2025
  • Chile — mandatory from January 2026
  • Philippines — draft standards issued 2025; largest listed companies expected to report from 2027

Is your company/ your client’s company already subject to IRFS, or will be in the coming months or years?

The ISSB maintains an adoption tracker:IFRS - Use of IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards by jurisdiction

California Climate Laws

There are jurisdictions which do not explicitly adopt ISSB’s standards, but their regulations are based on ISSB. For example, California Climate Law SB 261 which is based on IFRS S2.

California’s Climate Laws (Senate Bills 253 and 261): In 2023, California passed two landmark laws—SB 253 and SB 261.

  • SB 253 (GHG Emissions Disclosure):
    • Requires disclosure of Scopes 1 & 2 emissions by August 10, 2026 – however, in this first reporting year, there will be no assurance and no penalties
    • Requires Scope 3 emissions disclosure by 2027
  • SB 261 (Climate-Related Financial Risk Reporting):
    • Mandates climate risk reporting using IFRS S2 standards
    • Reporting was planned to begin 2026, then bi-annually thereafter
    • However, as of Q1 2026, this bill is on hold due to litigation by the Ninth Court
  • Who is Affected:
    • U.S. and non-U.S. companies
    • Minimum requirement: greater than $1 billion revenue in California
  • Consequences of Non-compliance:
    • SB 253 violation: penalties up to USD 50,000 per yea
    • SB 261 violation: penalties up to USD 500,000 per year
  • The Broader Regulatory Landscape:
    • Federal Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sustainability reporting is no longer actively enforced
    • Multiple states (Minnesota, Washington, New York, Illinois, Colorado) are developing similar laws
    • This signals a shift toward state-led climate action
  • Global Importance: California is among the first sub-national jurisdictions to mandate Scope 3 reporting

Digital Product Passport (DPP) and Emissions

Carbon disclosure is currently limited to corporate-level reporting through the Corporate Carbon Footprint (CCF) framework. However, the introduction of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) represents a significant regulatory shift, as it constitutes the first mandatory regulation requiring product-level carbon disclosure. Additional product-level regulations are anticipated to follow, with the Digital Product Passport (DPP) serving as a prominent example.

The European Union is implementing the DPP to provide end consumers with transparent information about product sustainability, mitigate greenwashing practices, and create market incentives for companies to transition toward environmentally responsible production methods.

A typical DPP will include carbon data on product-level, but also a range of other sustainability-related information.

Key data elements of a Digital Product Passport.
  • Material composition: (types and quantities of materials used)
  • Environmental footprint: (carbon emissions, water usage, circularity metrics)
  • Supply chain information: (origin of materials, manufacturing locations)
  • Compliance data: (certifications, regulatory conformance)
  • Circularity information: (repairability, recyclability, disassembly instructions)
  • Social impact data: (labor conditions, ethical sourcing)

DPP’s final format will be a QR code on the product that customers can scan to access the information. The real work behind that QR code, however, will be collecting, calculating and consolidating all required data points into that final format.

Who needs to produce DPPs?

Manufacturers, importers, and distributors selling in the EU need Digital Product Passports (DPPs) for prioritized sectors like batteries, textiles, electronics, furniture, and construction.

Implementation Timeline:

Phased rollout of Digital Product Passport (DPP) requirements from 2025 to 2033.
  • 2025: Current focus is on data platforms, internal readiness and standrads that are expected to be finalized by December 2025.
  • Feb 2025: EV battery passports begin.
  • Feb 2026: Rechargeable industrial battery passports begin.
  • 2027: Textiles, furniture, tyers, detergents face initial requirements.
  • 2028-2029: Electronics, batteries (other types), iron, steel, aluminium get phased in.
  • By 2030: All priority sectors should have full DPP compliance, including complex lifecycle data.
  • By 2033: A fully circular DPP with complete lifecycle data (reuse/recycling) is envisioned.

Note

SAP DPP functionality is currently in development. This section will be updated when that functionality will be available.

Business Example

A smartphone manufacturer creates a DPP that includes the carbon footprint of each component, repairability scores, and recycling instructions. Customers can scan a QR code to access this information, while the manufacturer uses it to optimize design for circularity and comply with EU regulations.

Conclusion

Now, you can clearly explain non-pricing carbon legislation and why disclosure matters. You can summarize CSRD fundamentals—ESRS rules, double materiality, Scopes 1–3—and judge in-scope companies post‑Omnibus, including key timelines.

You understand ISSB’s global baseline and how regimes like California align to it. You also recognize the move toward product-level data via Digital Product Passports. Next, you will tackle pricing tools such as EU Emissions Trading Systems (EU ETS) and Carbon Border Adjusted Mechanism (CBAM).