Introduction
In the bicycle manufacturing example, we have a three-step manufacturing process. During assembly, the operator documents minor defects, such as scratches on the surface of the bicycle frame, by assigning a nonconformance (NC) code. The quality assurance team can then use a report to get an overview of these minor defects and implement appropriate countermeasures if necessary.
The manufacturing process ends with a thorough in-process quality inspection. If the inspection reveals any issues, the operator can record the specific deviation as a nonconformance. In our example, the shop floor operator has identified that the tire pressure is too low. Therefore, it is necessary to halt the production process for the corresponding bicycle until the root cause of this defect is determined. When logging the NC code for the bicycle, the operator can provide additional information such as comments, pictures, immediate actions, and so on. They can then decide what should be done next with the bicycle, such as performing a local repair or routing it to other specialized analysis-repair stations. Once the analysis and repair are completed, the bicycle can return to its original manufacturing routing and the assembly process can resume.
Nonconformances
The nonconformance functionality in SAP Manufacturing Execution offers a mechanism to log, track, and handle failed or defective parts or assemblies. It enables you to:
- Document the nonconformance management process using a closed loop system.
- Speed up the disposition of nonconforming parts or material.
- Ensure that designated resources receive nonconformance work tasks and provide traceability.

During a test or inspection, it is possible to find a nonconformance for a product. It is important to detect and track the nonconformance to maintain the quality of the product high and minimize costs associated with quality and rework.

The initial detection of a nonconformance may not identify the cause of the failure. For instance, when testing the bicycle breaks, the shop floor operator identifies that the wheels are not stopping as expected. The initial detection of the nonconformance would identify that the breaks aren't working, but not the reason for this.

Once the nonconformance has been detected, it can be further analyzed to understand what the actual defect is to resolve the incident.
Additional analysis may be necessary to determine the reason for the nonconformance. For instance, in the previous example, if a the bicycle wheels aren't breaking as expected, a technician can conduct a more thorough examination and discover that there is a disconnected wiring in the breaking system. The follow up nonconformance should be logged against the original nonconformance incident, indicating the potential root cause of the original failure.

Once the technician determines the root cause, they can now perform the necessary actions to correct the defect. For example, the technician would choose to reconnect the disconnected wiring . This repair action would then be logged as part of the chain of nonconformances to track the successful resolution and close the loop on the nonconformance. The repair action allows the unit to be recognized as work in process of good quality.
Note
For more information about nonconformances, refer to the SAP Application Documentation.