Comparing Rates 2.0 to Rates 1.0

Objective

After completing this lesson, you will be able to explain how Rates 2.0 provides greater flexibility and efficiency over Rates 1.0

Comparing Rates 2.0 and Rates 1.0

Comparing Rates 2.0 and Rates 1.0

Organizations can gain increased flexibility in configuring Rates 2.0. As a result, many of the steps originally required in the creation of rates in SAP Fieldglass have been simplified, and the amount of data required to create rates has been vastly reduced.

Here’s an example showing how a rate structure in Rates 2.0 reduces the amount of objects required for the same rate data:

Rates 1.0 to Rates 2.0 Comparison

ElementRates 1.0Rates 2.0
Rate Categories66
Rate Components6237
Rate Component Groups1,2646
Rate Codes10,8846
Rate Groups2,5900
Rate Grids2100
Worker Pay Types312
Pick List Values0681
Custom Lookups02

With Rates 1.0, data objects are created and structured up to culminate in a Rate Grid. With Rates 2.0, fewer admin objects are required because pick list values make up the bulk of rate data.

Search for Rates Using Rates 1.0 and Rates 2.0

Let's compare navigating the Rates 2.0 structure in the admin menu with navigating Rates 1.0 in the SAP Fieldglass user interface. We’ll look into the process an SAP Fieldglass administrator would follow to find the minimum and maximum rates for an Administrator sourced by re:CrewIT within the Chicago area.

Log in to track your progress & complete quizzes