Monitoring a Relocation of Technical Objects

Objective

After completing this lesson, you will be able to describe the relocation process of technical objects

Technical Object Relocation

The image appears to be a diagram illustrating the relationship between a Utilizer and an Owner, as represented by the FE (functional entity) symbols. The diagram shows that the Utilizer has a relationship with a SLOC (a technical object), while the Owner has a technical object relationship. The central component in the diagram is labeled MEQ.

The process of Relocation of a Technical Object integrates into plenty of Defense and Security applications and areas like Transport Management (TM) or Project System (PS). Defense Maintenance is supporting this process by displaying the result of a relocation as relationships on Master Equipment level.

Master Equipment can be connected to a Force Element using two Relationships: Owner and Utilizer. Those relationships integrate to the Material Authorization and Status Management processes of the Defense and Security solution. The Owner Relationship is created by a direct binding between the Force Element and a Master Equipment. This can be processed in the Manage Force Element application. As with other relationships in Defense and Security, we have additional attributes like start and end dates to manage relationships for specific time intervals.

The Utilizer is determined by the MEQs (Master Equipment) Storage Location.

The image appears to be a diagram illustrating relationships between a Utilizer and an Owner, represented by the FE (functional entity) symbols. It also includes screenshots of technical details and operational data for aircraft equipment and maintenance. The diagram and screenshots do not contain any human faces or identifiable individuals.

This figure displays the applications where the relationships get defined.

The image consists of a diagram and screenshots displaying technical details and operational data for an aircraft equipment item. The diagram shows the relationships between a Utilizer and an Owner, represented by the FE (functional entity) symbols. The screenshots provide information such as the equipment ID, description, and other technical and operational details. The image does not contain any human faces or identifiable individuals.

This figure displays the aggregation result of the Owner/Utilizer Relationship at Master Equipment level.

The image shows two diagrams representing Unit A and Unit B, each containing various functional entities (FEs) and a helicopter (Helicopter 12102). The diagrams illustrate the relationships between the FEs and the helicopter. In Unit B, a New Owner is indicated. The image does not contain any human faces or identifiable individuals.

If the Technical Object is moved to a new unit on a permanent basis, the owner of the Technical Object is changed. Such change of an owner integrates into Material Authorizations and planner can identify gaps between the authorized number of Technical Objects for a specific unit and the number it actually owns. If there are no changes in authorizations and Unit A relocates a Technical Object to Unit B by changing the ownership, Unit A is authorized for another Helicopter. This can be displayed in the AAC.

The image shows two diagrams representing Unit A and Unit B. Each unit contains various functional entities (FEs) and a technical object (SLoc1 and SLoc2) associated with a helicopter (Helicopter 12102). The diagram for Unit B indicates a New Utilizer in relation to the helicopter. The image does not contain any human faces or identifiable individuals.

In another example, the Technical Object is moved to a new unit on a non-permanent basis. An example would be a limited time move for a specific operation or training. Since the Object is still owned by Unit A and just utilized by Unit B, Unit A is not authorized to receive another Helicopter. The Helicopter will be located back to Unit A after the operation or training is finished. For changing such relationship, the SLoc of the MEQ is changed by posting a goods movement.

Defense Maintenance further supports the check and update of maintenance related SAP objects. As Unit B could be responsible to perform maintenance activities for the time it utilizes the Technical Object, there is the need for a user to check if the new unit organizational data (Plant, Responsible Work Center, Cost Center and Profit Center) is up to date.

Log in to track your progress & complete quizzes